You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was wondering if any of the maintainers had a philosophical objection to making ignore::dir::Ignore and related machinery part of the public API. I've found myself needing to reimplement Walk with slightly modified file system abstractions, and it would be really helpful to be able to reuse the Ignore bits.
Happy to put up the PR if this seems reasonable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This would be very useful especially with the ability to clone WalkBuilder.ig_builder, that would allow to check if a currently non-existing file/directory would be ignored before creating it.
I was wondering if any of the maintainers had a philosophical objection to making
ignore::dir::Ignore
and related machinery part of the public API. I've found myself needing to reimplementWalk
with slightly modified file system abstractions, and it would be really helpful to be able to reuse theIgnore
bits.Happy to put up the PR if this seems reasonable.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: