Skip to content

fix: FunctionTypeEnum member case #762

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025
Merged

fix: FunctionTypeEnum member case #762

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 5, 2025

Conversation

t-col
Copy link
Contributor

@t-col t-col commented Mar 5, 2025

No description provided.

@t-col t-col marked this pull request as ready for review March 5, 2025 22:52
@t-col t-col requested a review from a team as a code owner March 5, 2025 22:52
@t-col t-col merged commit 132b8f7 into main Mar 5, 2025
11 checks passed
@t-col t-col deleted the fix/fn-type-enum-members branch March 5, 2025 22:55
contentful-automation bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2025
@contentful-automation
chore(release): 3.11.0 [skip ci]
be22e09 
# [3.11.0](v3.10.2...v3.11.0) (2025-03-05)

### Bug Fixes

* FunctionTypeEnum member case ([#762](#762)) ([132b8f7](132b8f7))

### Features

* accurate TS types for each App Event payload type ([#761](#761)) ([f95db67](f95db67))
@contentful-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 3.11.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@michaelpineirocontentful michaelpineirocontentful michaelpineirocontentful approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
released
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@t-col @michaelpineirocontentful