We've been aligning our MCP registry with the new official standards

[GabrielDrapor]

Pre-submission Checklist

• This post follows the MCP community guidelines

What would you like to share?

Hi developers,

We're Path Integral, a AI company driven by our mission to revolutionize scientific research and business operations through cutting-edge artificial intelligence solutions.

Really excited to see the official MCP registry taking shape at this project. Our team has been working on a similar initiative for the past few months, and we wanted to share our experience and offer our support.

For the few past months, our team has maintained a fully open-sourced MCP registry at getmcp.io, collecting over 300+ MCP servers with relatively reliable information. We've been proactively aligning it with the new official standards recently. In fact, we believe we may have been one of the first implementations to support the official protocol specifications.

Additionally, We're also working on a comprehensive MCP manager MCPM over the past preiod. We'll adapt it to be fully compatible with the new registry standards.

The team remains fully committed to supporting the official MCP registry standards. The potential for MCP to establish important standards excites us, and we look forward to being part of this collaborative effort.

Thank you,
Path Integral

Relevant Links

• Our official site: https://www.pathintegral.xyz

• our registry:
  • endpoints that are compatible with official registry:
    • https://getmcp.io/v0/health
    • https://getmcp.io/v0/servers
  • repo: https://github.com/pathintegral-institute/getmcp.io

• our MCP manager:
  • https://mcpm.sh

[tadasant]

Thank you @GabrielDrapor! Appreciate your open source work.

We'd very much value your input and what you've experienced with combing through all the various ways people are setting up and distributing MCP servers. In particular, if you have any feedback as to whether our draft API shapes cover all edge cases and possibilities, we'd welcome suggestions for improvements.

I know you've jumped ahead and implemented it in your endponts -- do know that these shapes are still a WIP and are likely to be iterated upon until initial launch.