-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 134
Renaming TG.Number to TG.Constant #30
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Hmmm... Could you elaborate a bit more? |
What I mean by "it makes a bit more sense in the context of generating values" is, if you think of these generators as mathematical functions like, for example, TG.SinX would be Or, another reason why I think it would make more sense is because the number 1, which is used here, is also a mathematical constant. Mainly the reason why I was suggesting that it should be changed is because, in my opinion the name TG.Number is a bit ambiguous and TG.Constant would imply some properties that would help understand what it does (output a fixed value) and what it could be used for (offset the output value, for example). |
Actually, how about |
Yes, that sounds good! |
Any luck? 😅 |
Oh! Sorry. I didn't realize that you were waiting for this. It's been a while and I've been playing around with this every now and then, so there is some stuff that has piled up over time. Anyways, I've prepared some of those changes now. |
I think it would be better if TG.Number was renamed to TG.Constant.
In my opinion, it makes a bit more sense in the context of generating values and gives a better idea of what it does and what it is used for.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: