You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Investigating read errors triggering panic fixed in #16042 I've
found that we have a race in a sync process between the moment
dirty record for cloned block is removed and the moment dbuf is
destroyed. If dmu_buf_hold_array_by_dnode() take a hold on a
cloned dbuf before it is synced/destroyed, then dbuf_read_impl()
may see it still in DB_NOFILL state, but without the dirty record.
Such case is not an error, but equivalent to DB_UNCACHED, since
the dbuf block pointer is already updated by dbuf_write_ready().
Unfortunately it is impossible to safely change the dbuf state
to DB_UNCACHED there, since there may already be another cloning
in progress, that dropped dbuf lock before creating a new dirty
record, protected only by the range lock.
Reviewed-by: Rob Norris <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Robert Evans <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
Closes#16052
0 commit comments