You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a comment pointed out in #2823 (comment), OLM is still referencing the upstream-opm-builder image instead of opm. This is causing issues installing operators on ARM64 based Kubernetes clusters.
What did you do?
Attempted to install MetalLB operator on my ARM64 based cluster.
What did you expect to see?
No errors when installing operators.
What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
The kubernetes job controlled spawned during installation returned CPU architecture related errors.
Kubernetes cluster kind:
Self hosted using ARM cluster
Possible Solution
Workaround was identified by @agelwarg 's comment #2823 (comment). Append two additional args in the deployment/catalog-operator in the olm namespace.
Bug Report
In a comment pointed out in #2823 (comment), OLM is still referencing the upstream-opm-builder image instead of opm. This is causing issues installing operators on ARM64 based Kubernetes clusters.
What did you do?
Attempted to install MetalLB operator on my ARM64 based cluster.
What did you expect to see?
No errors when installing operators.
What did you see instead? Under which circumstances?
The kubernetes job controlled spawned during installation returned CPU architecture related errors.
Environment
v0.24.0
Self hosted using ARM cluster
Possible Solution
Workaround was identified by @agelwarg 's comment #2823 (comment). Append two additional args in the deployment/catalog-operator in the olm namespace.
workaround:
original:
Additional context
Add any other context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: