You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Copy file name to clipboardExpand all lines: docs/main/dashboard.md
+2-7Lines changed: 2 additions & 7 deletions
Original file line number
Diff line number
Diff line change
@@ -41,13 +41,8 @@ _Checkout: the ['Energy Imports'](import-calculations) infopage in the Dashboard
41
41
The number shows the total yearly cost of energy supply for your scenario. The chart displays the costs for the present (left) and final scenario year (right) composed of the costs for different types of energy production.
42
42
43
43
## Profitability of power plants
44
-
Percentage of plants installed in your scenario that make a profit.
45
-
46
-
_Note: The value is in current year's euros. It includes the costs of the primary energy carriers and the costs of all the plants that produce electricity and/or heat. Go to the 'Detailed information > Costs > [Overview of costs per sector](cost-overview-per-sector.md)' infopage for more information on the cost calculation._
47
-
48
-
_Checkout: the ['Costs (dashboard)''](cost-dashboard) infopage for more information._
49
-
50
-
_Checkout: the infopages under ['Costs'](cost-main-principles) for more information on how costs are defined and calculated within the ETM._
44
+
The percentage on the dashboard shows which percentage of the installed dispatchable power production capacity is economically viable. This table shows (of all plants, not only the dispatchable plants) what plants are profitable or unprofitable in your scenario. For more information about the table, please visit ['Economic viability of assets'](economic-viability)
This section explains the economic viability of power plants, as presented in the following tables:
6
-
-**Economic viability of electricity production technologies**
7
-
-**Economic viability of electricity storage technologies**
8
-
-**Economic viability of flexible electricity demand technologies**
9
6
10
-
As described in the [Cost methods](cost-methods.md), the ETM separates fuel costs from OPEX and CAPEX for each cost group. To accurately assess the economic viability of power production facilities, fuel costs must be included in the calculations.
7
+
8
+
**Economic viability of electricity production technologies**
9
+
10
+
The technologies in this table are in one of the following categories:
***Must-run powerplants** (e.g. Coal gas CCGT (must-run))
14
+
15
+
**Economic viability of electricity storage technologies**
16
+
17
+
The technologies in this table are comprised of the following categories:
18
+
***Batteries in households**
19
+
***Batteries in Electric vehicles** (e.g. Batteries in electric vans)
20
+
***Large batteries** (e.g. Flow batteries)
21
+
22
+
For more information concerning these technologies, please view [Electricity storage](electricity-storage).
23
+
24
+
**Economic viability of flexible electricity demand technologies**
25
+
26
+
The technologies in this table are comprised of the following categories:
27
+
***Power-to-heat** (e.g. Heat pump)
28
+
***Synthetic kerosene production** (e.g. Electrolysers for synthetic kerosene)
29
+
***Hydrogen production** (e.g. Electrolysers)
30
+
31
+
Please view [Electricity conversion](electricity-conversion) for more information concerning these technologies.
32
+
33
+
### Cost calculations
34
+
35
+
As described in the [Cost methods](cost-methods.md), the ETM separates fuel costs from OPEX and CAPEX for each cost group. To accurately assess the economic viability on a plant level, fuel costs must be included in the calculations.
11
36
12
37
In these tables, different cost methods are used compared to the rest of the model. Each table contains four columns, each showing calculations related to costs and revenue. All values are expressed in euros per MWh of the output carrier. The calculations for each column are as follows:
13
38
14
39
1.**CAPEX (€/MWh)**
15
-
The CAPEX is based on the plant's capital expenditure as shown in the [Cost methods](cost-methods.md). The unit is in euros per MWh of the relevant output carrier. For a power producer this means that the CAPEX is divided by the electricity output, for a power-to-heat producer for example, it is divided by the heat output in MWh.
40
+
The CAPEX is based on the plant's capital expenditure as shown in the [Cost methods](cost-methods.md). The unit is in euros per MWh of the relevant output carrier. For a power producer this means that the CAPEX is divided by the electricity output, for a power-to-heat producer for example, it is divided by the heat output in MWh.
16
41
17
42
2.**OPEX (€/MWh)**
18
43
The OPEX in these tables differs from the regular OPEX calculated in the ETM. Fuel and emissions costs are included. For technologies using electricity as an input (such as batteries and flexible electricity demand technologies), OPEX is based on the hourly electricity market calculations in the ETM. The OPEX formula is illustrated below:
19
44
20
-

45
+

21
46
22
47
This value is then divided by the MWh of the output carrier.
23
48
@@ -29,20 +54,19 @@ In these tables, different cost methods are used compared to the rest of the mod
29
54
30
55

31
56
32
-
##Special technology cases
57
+
### Notable exceptions
33
58
34
59
Some technology categories have more complex cost and revenue structures:
35
60
36
61
1.**CHPs**
37
-
CHPs are a special case because they produce both electricity and heat. However, only the revenue from electricity production is considered, as no value is assigned to the heat they generate.
62
+
CHPs are a special case because they produce both electricity and heat. However, only the revenue from electricity production is considered, as no value is assigned to the heat they generate. Please view [Waste outputs and costable factor](../contrib/waste-outputs) for more information on the modelling of CHPs.
38
63
39
64
2.**Flexible synthetic kerosene production**
40
-
Synthetic kerosene production uses both electricity and hydrogen as input carriers. Therefore, fuel cost calculations are based on the input of both carriers.
65
+
Synthetic kerosene production uses both electricity and hydrogen as input carriers. Therefore, fuel cost calculations are based on the input of both carriers. Please view [Power for synthetic kerosene production](electricity-conversion/#power-for-synthetic-kerosene-production) for more information.
41
66
42
67
3.**Battery parks & offshore hybrid wind parks**
43
-
These plants consist of multiple components. As a result, it is difficult to determine the economic viability of one of the components in the plant.
44
-
For this reason, these have been left out of the tables.
68
+
These plants consist of multiple components. As a result, it is difficult to determine the economic viability of one of the components in the plant. For this reason, these have been left out of the tables. Please view [Always on battery parks](../contrib/always-on-battery-parks) & [Hybrid offshore wind](hybrid-offshore-wind) for more information on these technologies.
45
69
46
70
4.**Battery electric vehicles**
47
-
The costs associated with Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) are not solely related to their role in the energy system, as their primary function is transportation. For this reason, the BEV CAPEX and economic viability columns are excluded from the Economic Viability table. However, the table does include the other relevant columns: the average cost of electricity used for charging (OPEX) and the average profit from electricity discharged back to the grid (Revenue). These can be used to assess the business case of BEV's in a scenario.
71
+
The costs associated with Battery Electric Vehicles (BEVs) are not solely related to their role in the energy system, as their primary function is transportation. For this reason, the BEV CAPEX and economic viability columns are excluded from the Economic Viability table. However, the table does include the other relevant columns: the average cost of electricity used for charging (OPEX) and the average profit from electricity discharged back to the grid (Revenue). These can be used to assess the business case of BEVs in a scenario. For more information concerning the cost of BEVs please view [Cost overview of the transport sector](cost-overview-per-sector/#transport).
0 commit comments