You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
airq_iv_(alloc|free) is called by some users with interrupts enabled
and by some with interrupts disabled which leads to the following
lockdep warning:
[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
3.14.0-15249-gbf29b7b-dirty #25 Not tainted
---------------------------------------------------------
insmod/2108 just changed the state of lock:
(&(&iv->lock)->rlock){+.....}, at: [<000000000046ee3e>] airq_iv_alloc+0x62/0x228
but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-READ-safe lock in the past:
(&info->lock){.-.-..}
and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
other info that might help us debug this:
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(&(&iv->lock)->rlock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&info->lock);
lock(&(&iv->lock)->rlock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&info->lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
Although this is a false alarm (since each airq user consistently
calls these functions from the same context) fix this by ensuring
that interrupts are disabled when the airq lock is held.
Reported-by: Frank Blaschka <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Ott <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <[email protected]>
0 commit comments