Make TransactionBuilder's constructor public #220
Replies: 2 comments 6 replies
-
I converted this to a discussion as this is more a feature request than a bug report. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
My use case is that I've got my own struct implementing That's all working fine for the most common uses, except the ones that need more fine-grained control over the transaction options, like the isolation level. This is where I need a
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
TransactionBuilder
is already generic overAsyncConnection<Backend = Pg, TransactionManager = AnsiTransactionManager>
, and I would like to take advantage of this to use it with a connnection other thanAsyncPgConnection
.In my testing, it all should work just fine if
diesel_async/src/pg/transaction_builder.rs
Line 30 in 1c36b65
Are there any reasons why the constructor shouldn't be made public?
If not, I'm happy to submit a PR to make it so.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions