Skip to content

Rangeselector refactor #3818

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

michael-hawker
Copy link
Member

Continuing #3812

Fixes

Rebased and merged in some more tests. Cleaned-up some style-cop issues and fixed some base test infrastructure issues. Tests should represent valid scenarios, but this code-base is emitting problems.

Also renamed properties for clarity.

Looks like RangeEnd is always set to 1 on initial construction.

FYI @RosarioPulella

PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

What is the current behavior?

What is the new behavior?

PR Checklist

Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:

  • Tested code with current supported SDKs
  • Pull Request has been submitted to the documentation repository instructions. Link:
  • Sample in sample app has been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)
  • New major technical changes in the toolkit have or will be added to the Wiki e.g. build changes, source generators, testing infrastructure, sample creation changes, etc...
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes / features) (if applicable)
  • Header has been added to all new source files (run build/UpdateHeaders.bat)
  • Contains NO breaking changes

Other information

Rosuavio and others added 26 commits March 4, 2021 13:58
Replace with FormatForToolTip
into file based on type of input
Clean-up some Style-cop issues.
These properties and their descriptions were confusing (and abbreviated) which made it difficult to understand how they differed from the Minimum/Maximum value properties.
This clearly now separates which properties are being selected by the user. Their comments have been updated as well.
It also aligns with the new Range struct field names in .NET: Start/End.
Think there's an issue with DataRow and the Cleanup Method though
Also getting a 'Parameter count Mismatch' from MSTest before anything is even run :(
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 8, 2021

Thanks michael-hawker for opening a Pull Request! The reviewers will test the PR and highlight if there is any conflict or changes required. If the PR is approved we will proceed to merge the pull request 🙌

@ghost ghost requested review from azchohfi, Kyaa-dost and Rosuavio March 8, 2021 10:54
@michael-hawker
Copy link
Member Author

I have no idea what caused the tests to fail, it seems like they just stopped... @azchohfi any ideas on how we can debug what's going on here?

Locally they seem to just stop at one point and spit out:

---------- Starting test run ----------
The active test run was aborted. Reason: Unable to communicate with test host process.
========== Test run aborted: 0 Tests run in 21.7 sec (0 Passed, 0 Failed, 0 Skipped) ==========

@michael-hawker michael-hawker added this to the 7.0 milestone Mar 8, 2021
@michael-hawker
Copy link
Member Author

Debugged one of the tests and hit a StackOverflow for RangeEnd in one of the tests that wasn't reporting. Wonder if that's messing things up elsewhere?

@michael-hawker
Copy link
Member Author

Superseded by #3822 for now.

@michael-hawker michael-hawker removed this from the 7.0 milestone Mar 8, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants