Skip to content

added: move blocking feature in LinMPC, ExplicitMPC and NonLinMPC #201

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 20 commits into from
May 29, 2025

Conversation

franckgaga
Copy link
Member

@franckgaga franckgaga commented May 10, 2025

Custom move blocking pattern is a way of specifying long control horizon $H_c$ without increasing the number of decision variable. This feature is a bit less common than normal control Horizon IMO, so I documented it in details in move_blocking, which is in the internal section (to avoid too much text in LinMPC or NonLinMPC documentation), but I included a link to move_blocking in the two constructors.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented May 10, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.92%. Comparing base (03cb818) to head (bd24cb7).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #201   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.91%   98.92%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        4255     4285   +30     
=======================================
+ Hits         4209     4239   +30     
  Misses         46       46           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@franckgaga
Copy link
Member Author

@franckgaga franckgaga linked an issue May 16, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@franckgaga franckgaga merged commit 44a5589 into main May 29, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Implement manipulated input blocking
2 participants