Open
Description
From zarr-developers/numcodecs#524 it looks like zarr-v3 has a narrower definition of codecs. There isn't much detail at the moment, but I wanted to at least mention it and maybe start the discussion of how we should support such codecs in Zarr.jl.
Do we want to support both zarr-v2 and zarr-v3 in the same codec? Some of the codec names and parameters have changed, so do we want to have getCompressorv2
and getCompressorv3
functions separately?
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels