Large int bug

[MauriceHendrix]

Description

Fixed an issue with printing large ints

Motivation and Context

There was an issue where in some environments (but not all) large numbers such as 8.034023767017109e+27 whch were ints would be printed as an the int 8034023767017108950029959168 and then the C++ compiler would complain as that's more than the maximum int value. This has been fixed by only printing ints as ints if they are MIN_INT < number < MAX_INT else we print them as a float (and we get the sceintific notation).

Types of changes

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Documentation checklist

• I have updated all documentation in the code where necessary.
• I have checked spelling in all (new) comments and documentation.
• I have added a note to RELEASE.md if relevant (new feature, breaking change, or notable bug fix).
• I have updated version & citation.txt & citation.cff version.

Testing

• Testing is done automatically and codecov shows test coverage
• This cannot be tested automatically

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #238 (c0daf47) into master (3aa2b20) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            master      #238    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files           26        30     +4     
  Lines         1522      1775   +253     
==========================================
+ Hits          1522      1775   +253     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
chaste_codegen/__init__.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_chaste_printer.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_command_line_script.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_labview_printer.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_linearity_check.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_lookup_tables.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_optimize.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_partial_eval.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/_rdf.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
chaste_codegen/backward_euler_model.py	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
... and 10 more

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5fe5344...c0daf47. Read the comment docs.

[MauriceHendrix]

@kwabenantim I'm not expecting you to review the code, but let me know if this solves the issue, if it does I'll release this version.

[MauriceHendrix]

There was an issue where in some environments (but not all) large numbers such as 8.034023767017109e+27 whch were ints would be printed as an the int 8034023767017108950029959168 and then the C++ compiler would complain as that's more than the maximum int value. This has been fixed by only printing ints as ints if they are MIN_INT < number < MAX_INT else we print them as a float (and we get the sceintific notation).