Skip to content

Add dynamic fee modal #1031

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

Add dynamic fee modal #1031

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

bajajanirudh
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Mar 7, 2025

🚨 Potential security issues detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

To accept the risk, merge this PR and you will not be notified again.

Alert Package NoteSourceCI
Dynamic require npm/[email protected] ⚠︎
Filesystem access npm/[email protected] ⚠︎

View full report↗︎

Next steps

What is dynamic require?

Dynamic require can indicate the package is performing dangerous or unsafe dynamic code execution.

Packages should avoid dynamic imports when possible. Audit the use of dynamic require to ensure it is not executing malicious or vulnerable code.

What is filesystem access?

Accesses the file system, and could potentially read sensitive data.

If a package must read the file system, clarify what it will read and ensure it reads only what it claims to. If appropriate, packages can leave file system access to consumers and operate on data passed to it instead.

Take a deeper look at the dependency

Take a moment to review the security alert above. Review the linked package source code to understand the potential risk. Ensure the package is not malicious before proceeding. If you're unsure how to proceed, reach out to your security team or ask the Socket team for help at support [AT] socket [DOT] dev.

Remove the package

If you happen to install a dependency that Socket reports as Known Malware you should immediately remove it and select a different dependency. For other alert types, you may may wish to investigate alternative packages or consider if there are other ways to mitigate the specific risk posed by the dependency.

Mark a package as acceptable risk

To ignore an alert, reply with a comment starting with @SocketSecurity ignore followed by a space separated list of ecosystem/package-name@version specifiers. e.g. @SocketSecurity ignore npm/[email protected] or ignore all packages with @SocketSecurity ignore-all

Copy link

socket-security bot commented Mar 8, 2025

New, updated, and removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

Package New capabilities Transitives Size Publisher
npm/[email protected] environment, filesystem 0 75.8 kB motdotla
npm/[email protected] environment, filesystem Transitive: eval, shell +56 4.72 MB juergba

View full report↗︎

bytes calldata /*data*/
) external override {
// Record swap amount in history
uint256 amount = uint256(abs(amount0Delta > 0 ? amount0Delta : amount1Delta));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It can save gas

Suggested change
uint256 amount = uint256(abs(amount0Delta > 0 ? amount0Delta : amount1Delta));
uint256 amount = uint256(amount0Delta > 0 ? amount0Delta : abs(amount1Delta));

Comment on lines +67 to +68
uint256 currentTime = block.timestamp;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < swapHistory.length; i++) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's view function, but also it's called in swapWithDynamicFee and addLiquidityWithDynamicFee functions.
So it should be gas optimized.

Suggested change
uint256 currentTime = block.timestamp;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < swapHistory.length; i++) {
uint256 currentTime = block.timestamp;
uint256 numHistory = swapHistory.length;
for (uint256 i = 0; i < numHistory; ++i) {


// Enforce minimum and maximum fee bounds
if (fee < MIN_FEE) fee = MIN_FEE;
if (fee > MAX_FEE) fee = MAX_FEE;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If fee is below MIN_FEE, it's not necessary to check whether it's above MAX_FEE

Suggested change
if (fee > MAX_FEE) fee = MAX_FEE;
else if (fee > MAX_FEE) fee = MAX_FEE;

Copy link

stale bot commented Jun 15, 2025

Is this still relevant? If so, what is blocking it? Is there anything you can do to help move it forward?

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jun 15, 2025
@stale stale bot closed this Jun 22, 2025
Copy link

@Rayluv29 Rayluv29 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Interesting

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants