Skip to content

Clear, positive, approachable, user tested CoC? #20

Open
@combinatorist

Description

@combinatorist

To me, the CfA Code of Conduct seems full of confusing, verbose, and negative legalese. It feels more like an SAT comprehension test than a visionary and welcoming public document. On the other end of the spectrum, I find Exercism's CoC very clear and approachable.

I don't want to word-smith for it's own sake, but I think two of the most important features of a Code of Conduct (besides the content) are its clarity and readability.

So, I was wondering has CfA ever tested this document against real users?

  • How do they feel after reading it?
  • Do they feel welcome and know what to expect (particularly if they're part of a protected class)?
  • What are their impressions of the organization after reading it?
  • Do they feel confident enforcing this code of conduct (particularly if they're a leader)?
  • Can they accurately identify violations when quizzed with example situations?

Those are just some ideas of how to measure the document's effectiveness. A bonus of measuring effectiveness is that it could help us make purposeful improvements without pointless word-smithing.

I'm also thinking about doing an unconference workshop to hack on the CoC together at the upcoming 2018 Brigade Congress, so contact me if you're interested (tim | codefornashville.org).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions