Skip to content

Test: Rename the integrate tests of OFDFT. #6246

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 31, 2025

Conversation

sunliang98
Copy link
Collaborator

Reminder

  • Have you linked an issue with this pull request?
  • Have you added adequate unit tests and/or case tests for your pull request?
  • Have you noticed possible changes of behavior below or in the linked issue?
  • Have you explained the changes of codes in core modules of ESolver, HSolver, ElecState, Hamilt, Operator or Psi? (ignore if not applicable)

Linked Issue

Fix #...

Unit Tests and/or Case Tests for my changes

  • A unit test is added for each new feature or bug fix.

What's changed?

  • Example: My changes might affect the performance of the application under certain conditions, and I have tested the impact on various scenarios...

Any changes of core modules? (ignore if not applicable)

  • Example: I have added a new virtual function in the esolver base class in order to ...

@sunliang98 sunliang98 requested a review from mohanchen May 29, 2025 11:08
@mohanchen mohanchen added The Absolute Zero Reduce the "entropy" of the code to 0 Unit Tests/Integreate Tests Issues/PR related to unit tests and integrate tests labels May 31, 2025
@mohanchen mohanchen merged commit 98e51b4 into deepmodeling:develop May 31, 2025
14 of 16 checks passed
kluophysics pushed a commit to kluophysics/abacus-develop that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
The Absolute Zero Reduce the "entropy" of the code to 0 Unit Tests/Integreate Tests Issues/PR related to unit tests and integrate tests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants