Changes ternary conditionals to be PEP308 compliant #5827
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Yup, looks good. Thanks! |
pchiquet
pushed a commit
to pchiquet/django-rest-framework
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 17, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Updates the tutorial and the codebase to be be PEP308-compliant with regards to conditional ternary operations
this if condition else that.I came across this from following the tutorial and found that the example was using
condition and this or that-style conditional which seemed not very Pythonic. The codebase only uses this style once and this pull request also changes that instance.