Skip to content

xds: Expose filter names to filter instances #11971

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 21, 2025

Conversation

ejona86
Copy link
Member

@ejona86 ejona86 commented Mar 21, 2025

This is to support gRFC A83 xDS GCP Authentication Filter:

Otherwise, the filter will look in the CDS resource's metadata for a
key corresponding to the filter's instance name.

CC @sergiitk, @kannanjgithub, @larry-safran

This is to support gRFC A83 xDS GCP Authentication Filter:
> Otherwise, the filter will look in the CDS resource's metadata for a
> key corresponding to the filter's instance name.
@ejona86 ejona86 requested a review from shivaspeaks March 21, 2025 00:31
@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ public boolean isClientFilter() {
}

@Override
public FaultFilter newInstance() {
public FaultFilter newInstance(String name) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Right. We are not using name here but just to follow the interface we are doing this. I have ditto commit in local.. :)

@shivaspeaks
Copy link
Member

Merging it now to unblock further work on GCPAuthenticationFilter.

@shivaspeaks shivaspeaks merged commit d2d72cd into grpc:master Mar 21, 2025
16 checks passed
@ejona86 ejona86 deleted the a83-filter-name branch March 21, 2025 15:04
Sangamesh1997 pushed a commit to Sangamesh1997/grpc-java that referenced this pull request Apr 3, 2025
This is to support gRFC A83 xDS GCP Authentication Filter:
> Otherwise, the filter will look in the CDS resource's metadata for a
> key corresponding to the filter's instance name.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants