Closed
Description
Since we already support managing HLS, this might be the next natural step. It would probably also have to be behind a config option. Currently the extension asks the user if they want it to manage HLS, we could extend it to 3 options:
- manage HLS only
- manage the entire haskell toolchain
- don't manage anything
if you pick 2., the extension will set manageHLS
, manageGHC
, manageStack
, manageCabal
to true
. So users who want very fine-grained behavior can dig into the config. But the popup shouldn't ask too many excessive questions.
I guess we also want equivalents for serverExecutablePath
then.
Opinions @fendor ?
Relevant:
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels