-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 109
add e2e tests for isito 1.25 and remove e2e tests for isito 1.22 #1297
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Continue to review full report in Codecov by Sentry.
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
/retest |
All IPv6 tests failed, because of the kernel issue: actions/runner-images#11985 which will cause kubeproxy fail to run: root@dev:~/scripts# klp kube-proxy-b95rc -n kube-system
I0410 11:41:11.086641 1 server.go:1062] "Successfully retrieved node IP(s)" IPs=["fc00:f853:ccd:e793::3"]
I0410 11:41:11.086857 1 conntrack.go:119] "Set sysctl" entry="net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_established" value=86400
I0410 11:41:11.086942 1 conntrack.go:119] "Set sysctl" entry="net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_tcp_timeout_close_wait" value=3600
I0410 11:41:11.163385 1 server.go:659] "kube-proxy running in dual-stack mode" primary ipFamily="IPv6"
I0410 11:41:11.163461 1 server_linux.go:165] "Using iptables Proxier"
I0410 11:41:11.167114 1 server_linux.go:511] "Detect-local-mode set to ClusterCIDR, but no cluster CIDR for family" ipFamily="IPv4"
I0410 11:41:11.167147 1 server_linux.go:528] "Defaulting to no-op detect-local"
I0410 11:41:11.170779 1 proxier.go:243] "Setting route_localnet=1 to allow node-ports on localhost; to change this either disable iptables.localhostNodePorts (--iptables-localhost-nodeports) or set nodePortAddresses (--nodeport-addresses) to filter loopback addresses"
I0410 11:41:11.171100 1 server.go:872] "Version info" version="v1.30.0"
I0410 11:41:11.171139 1 server.go:874] "Golang settings" GOGC="" GOMAXPROCS="" GOTRACEBACK=""
I0410 11:41:11.174884 1 config.go:192] "Starting service config controller"
I0410 11:41:11.175728 1 config.go:101] "Starting endpoint slice config controller"
I0410 11:41:11.176193 1 shared_informer.go:313] Waiting for caches to sync for service config
I0410 11:41:11.175736 1 config.go:319] "Starting node config controller"
I0410 11:41:11.176250 1 shared_informer.go:313] Waiting for caches to sync for endpoint slice config
I0410 11:41:11.176495 1 shared_informer.go:313] Waiting for caches to sync for node config
I0410 11:41:11.277195 1 shared_informer.go:320] Caches are synced for endpoint slice config
I0410 11:41:11.277291 1 shared_informer.go:320] Caches are synced for service config
I0410 11:41:11.277510 1 shared_informer.go:320] Caches are synced for node config
E0410 11:41:11.500986 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 23
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:41:11.501022 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:41:31.012148 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:41:31.012172 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:41:39.126737 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:41:39.126766 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:42:09.214364 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:42:09.214392 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:42:39.310901 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:42:39.310942 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:43:09.393419 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
>
I0410 11:43:09.393446 1 proxier.go:810] "Sync failed" retryingTime="30s"
E0410 11:43:39.486782 1 proxier.go:1511] "Failed to execute iptables-restore" err=<
exit status 2: Warning: Extension MARK revision 0 not supported, missing kernel module?
ip6tables-restore v1.8.9 (nf_tables): unknown option "--xor-mark"
Error occurred at line: 22
Try `ip6tables-restore -h' or 'ip6tables-restore --help' for more information.
> |
/retest |
We may need to skip ipv6 temporarily until github runner is fixed |
/retest |
Signed-off-by: YaoZengzeng <[email protected]>
/retest |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: hzxuzhonghu The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind enhancement
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #1292
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: