-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 121
Enricher: Make audit line source pluggable #2868
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
this change prepares a second PR which adds eBPF-based auditing
Hi @mhils. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/ok-to-test |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2868 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 45.50% 23.57% -21.93%
===========================================
Files 79 119 +40
Lines 7782 20272 +12490
===========================================
+ Hits 3541 4779 +1238
- Misses 4099 15254 +11155
- Partials 142 239 +97 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ccojocar, mhils The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/lgtm |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR makes the Enricher audit source pluggable. There are no functional changes, but I'm preparing a second PR which adds an eBPF-based backend usable in clusters where auditd/syslog is disabled.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
None
Does this PR have test?
Yes.
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?