[ASan][NFC] Remove duplicate variable AccessInfo #102305
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-compiler-rt-sanitizer @llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms Author: None (int-zjt) ChangesA variable named AccessInfo was used in a condition code block, but it is declared both in and out of this condition code block. Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102305.diff 1 Files Affected:
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
index 9fb1df7ab2b79..0ff5e9b815adf 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Transforms/Instrumentation/AddressSanitizer.cpp
@@ -1847,7 +1847,6 @@ void AddressSanitizer::instrumentAddress(Instruction *OrigIns,
InstrumentationIRBuilder IRB(InsertBefore);
size_t AccessSizeIndex = TypeStoreSizeToSizeIndex(TypeStoreSize);
- const ASanAccessInfo AccessInfo(IsWrite, CompileKernel, AccessSizeIndex);
if (UseCalls && ClOptimizeCallbacks) {
const ASanAccessInfo AccessInfo(IsWrite, CompileKernel, AccessSizeIndex);
|
int-zjt
changed the title
int-zjt
changed the title
|
@int-zjt Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/8/builds/2817 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference: |
|
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder Full details are available at: https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/59/builds/2823 Here is the relevant piece of the build log for the reference: |
A variable named AccessInfo was used in a condition code block, but it is declared both in and out of this condition code block.