Skip to content

fix: write back error message if the response marshal failed #235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 2, 2025

Conversation

ppzqh
Copy link
Contributor

@ppzqh ppzqh commented May 2, 2025

[#163] adds a logic to construct a error message when response marshal failed but return before sending to eventQueue.
This fix writes back the response.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling to ensure clients always receive an error message if a server-side processing issue occurs.
  • Tests

    • Added a new test to verify proper server behavior when response formatting fails.
    • Renamed a test helper function for clarity and consistency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented May 2, 2025

Walkthrough

This change modifies the error handling logic in the handleMessage method of the SSEServer struct. Specifically, it ensures that even if JSON marshalling of a response fails, a generic error message is still enqueued and sent to the client, rather than exiting early. Corresponding tests are updated to check this behavior, including renaming a utility function for consistency and adding a new test case that simulates a marshal error and verifies the server's response.

Changes

Files Change Summary
server/sse.go Modified handleMessage to remove early return on JSON marshal error, ensuring an error message is always enqueued.
server/sse_test.go Renamed readSeeEvent to readSSEEvent, added a test case for marshal errors, and performed minor whitespace cleanup.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • ezynda3

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f3fef81 and 4c89c0a.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • server/sse.go (0 hunks)
  • server/sse_test.go (8 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • server/sse.go
🔇 Additional comments (3)
server/sse_test.go (3)

65-65: Improved naming consistency by correcting function name

The renaming of readSeeEvent to readSSEEvent across all occurrences provides better consistency and clarity, as "SSE" is the correct acronym for Server-Sent Events.

Also applies to: 198-198, 593-593, 635-635, 683-683, 1156-1156, 1323-1323


639-639: Fixed variable naming for consistency

Variable names have been updated from respFromSee to respFromSSE to maintain consistency with the SSE (Server-Sent Events) acronym throughout the code.

Also applies to: 644-644, 688-688, 693-693


1244-1320: Well-implemented test case for marshal error handling

This new test case properly validates the fix for issue #163 by:

  1. Injecting an unmarshalable value (a function) into the response metadata
  2. Verifying that the server returns a 202 status code
  3. Confirming the error handling by checking for a null ID in the response

The test ensures that the server correctly writes back an error message when JSON marshalling fails, rather than discarding it.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@ezynda3 ezynda3 merged commit 90bd877 into mark3labs:main May 2, 2025
2 checks passed
adlternative pushed a commit to adlternative/mcp-go that referenced this pull request May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants