Skip to content

Fixed issue preventing README.md client example from compiling. #346

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2025

Conversation

PederHP
Copy link
Collaborator

@PederHP PederHP commented Apr 23, 2025

Recent changes mean that we need to use a named CancellationToken parameter as it is no longer the third parameter. I also fixed a spelling error in my name ;).

@PederHP PederHP requested a review from Copilot April 23, 2025 17:19
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes a compilation issue in the README.md client example by updating the CancellationToken usage to a named parameter, and also corrects a spelling error in the acknowledgements.

  • Updated the CancellationToken parameter from positional to named.
  • Corrected the spelling error from "Pederson" to "Pedersen" in the acknowledgements.
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

README.md:223

  • The spelling correction from 'Pederson' to 'Pedersen' appears correct. Confirm that this change aligns with the intended attribution.
The starting point for this library was a project called [mcpdotnet](https://github.com/PederHP/mcpdotnet), initiated by [Peder Holdgaard Pedersen](https://github.com/PederHP).

Copy link
Contributor

@halter73 halter73 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also fixed a spelling error in my name ;).

Sorry!

@halter73 halter73 merged commit 4fd3ebf into modelcontextprotocol:main Apr 23, 2025
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants