feat add supermicro MBD-X10SRH-CF and CSE-847BE1C-R1K23LPB

[kquinsland]

Chassis comes with images

I can make an argument either way for including SATA/USB ports on the motherboard as module-bay or not.
I omitted them on the X10SRH-CF for now, pending guidance.

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

Adds new YAML definitions for a Supermicro 4U chassis and its matching motherboard.

• Introduces SuperChassis 847BE1C4-R1K23LPB with detailed module-bay layout and basic metadata.
• Adds Motherboard X10SRH-CF definition including console ports, network interfaces, and module-bays.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File	Description
device-types/Supermicro/SuperChassis-847BE1C4-R1K23LPB.yaml	New 4U chassis definition
device-types/Supermicro/MBD-X10SRH-CF.yaml	New motherboard definition

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)

device-types/Supermicro/SuperChassis-847BE1C4-R1K23LPB.yaml:6

• The part_number is missing the '4' after 'CSE-847BE1C4'; it should match the model and slug. Please update to CSE-847BE1C4-R1K23LPB.

part_number: CSE-847BE1C-R1K23LPB

device-types/Supermicro/SuperChassis-847BE1C4-R1K23LPB.yaml:165

• Position "1" for SSD 1 duplicates the HDD bay numbering. Consider using "37" (and "38" for SSD 2) to avoid conflicts with existing drive bay positions.

position: "1"

device-types/Supermicro/MBD-X10SRH-CF.yaml:1

• Add a schema directive (e.g., # yaml-language-server: $schema=../../schema/racktype.json) at the top of the file for consistent YAML validation.

---

device-types/Supermicro/MBD-X10SRH-CF.yaml:48

• [nitpick] Consider removing or rephrasing the informal comment "i think?" to maintain clarity and professionalism in code comments.

#  DIMM also counts as a module-bay, i think?