Skip to content

tools: enable CodeQL config file #58036

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 28, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Apr 26, 2025

A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan

@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Review requested:

  • @nodejs/actions

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project. label Apr 26, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: nodejs#57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Apr 26, 2025

To test this, I pushed this change to my own fork along with a workflow_dispatch setting so I could manually start it. The results are at https://github.com/Trott/io.js/actions/runs/14681638189.

@Trott Trott requested a review from richardlau April 26, 2025 13:26
@Trott Trott added the fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. label Apr 26, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @Trott. Please 👍 to approve.

@Trott Trott added author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. and removed commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. labels Apr 27, 2025
@Trott Trott added commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. and removed fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. labels Apr 28, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot removed the commit-queue Add this label to land a pull request using GitHub Actions. label Apr 28, 2025
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot merged commit 067a779 into nodejs:main Apr 28, 2025
28 checks passed
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

Landed in 067a779

@Trott Trott deleted the codeql-config branch April 28, 2025 13:35
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 1, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 2, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 6, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
RafaelGSS pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 14, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 16, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
aduh95 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2025
A previous change designed to ignore test files in CodeQL scans had
multiple problems. This fixes the CodeQL scan breakage. It adds a
CodeQL config file, which allows us to ignore the test directory
in our scans.

Refs: #57978 (comment)
Refs: https://docs.github.com/en/code-security/code-scanning/creating-an-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning/customizing-your-advanced-setup-for-code-scanning#specifying-directories-to-scan
PR-URL: #58036
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <[email protected]>
Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. meta Issues and PRs related to the general management of the project.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants