adding collaborators, Nov 2015

[mikeal]

Here's a list of recent contributors who are not yet collaborators. If there are no objections I'll be adding them to the Website WG.

• @sup commits
• @kohei-takata commits
• @ZibbyKeaton commits
• @e-jigsaw commits
• @jorangreef commits
• @matthewloring commits
• @nstanard commits
• @woodyrew commits
• @anseljh commits
• @thephpjedi commits
• @xcatliu commits
• @Starefossen commits
• @isaacs commits

[stevemao]

I have no objections. I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?

Sent from my iPhone

On 13 Nov 2015, at 6:17 AM, Mikeal Rogers notifications@github.com wrote:

Here's a list of recent contributors who are not yet collaborators. If there are no objections I'll be adding them to the Website WG.

@sup commits
@kohei-takata commits
@ZibbyKeaton commits
@e-jigsaw commits
@jorangreef commits
@matthewloring commits
@nstanard commits
@woodyrew commits
@anseljh commits
@thephpjedi commits
@xcatliu commits
@Starefossen commits
@isaacs commits
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

[mikeal]

I'm just wondering how many collaborators you need here?

There's no real answer to this other than "more" while contributions are growing. Collaborators help with the sizable review load as we continue to gain more contributions (and we're not even near where we were on iojs.org for localizations yet).

[bnb]

+1 to this. However, we need to be 100% sure they know the general rules - more specifically the merging/PR rules. In the past it's only been a few contributors added, and the older contributors were able to confirm over Issues. I'm sure you have opinions/thoughts on this, @mikeal?

[evanlucas]

Do we want to go as far as having an onboarding?

[bnb]

There's an upside and a downside to it.

Upside is that everybody knows what's going on, and there will be as few mistakes as possible.

Downside is that we have to put effort into it. That sounds extremely lazy, but it's the most simple way to describe it. We may not have enough/willing/able people to be able to onboard, and it will limit the rate at which we can accept new collaborators a lot.

@bnb as for general rules - do you mean the contents of CONTRIBUTING.md?

[anseljh]

I contributed exactly 2 bytes, so feel free to defer any onboarding or other work for me! 👍

[bnb]

@sup Yes.

[bnb]

@sup As well as GOVERNANCE.md

@bnb i see, thanks (as though, the GOVERNANCE.md is a bit outdated, isn't it?)

[phillipj]

Nice @mikeal 👍

any progress on this? haven't heard from it in a while

[bnb]

@sup I would add you, but I'm not a team maintainer (just checked). @fhemberger @snostorm or @therebelrobot, as well as @mikeal and maybe a few other Org owners can add you. I'd say we've got the +1 for at least @sup, and if anyone else from the list above expresses interest soon, we can add them too.

[matthewloring]

@bnb I would be happy to become a collaborator as well.

[bnb]

@matthewloring Okay, just need another WG member to +1 you and you're set.