Skip to content

v2.x: MCA/ATOMICS/UCX: workaround for abstraction violation - v2.x #5417

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

hoopoepg
Copy link
Contributor

  • updated get-key call to get link to local module
  • method mca_spml_ucx_get_mkey_slow is moved into .c module,
    added pointer to this method into mca_spml_ucx_t structure
  • added spml_mca to dependency list of atomic_ucx

Signed-off-by: Sergey Oblomov [email protected]

cherry-picked from 910e08f

- updated get-key call to get link to local module
- method mca_spml_ucx_get_mkey_slow is moved into .c module,
  added pointer to this method into mca_spml_ucx_t structure
- added spml_mca to dependency list of atomic_ucx

Signed-off-by: Sergey Oblomov <[email protected]>

cherry-picked from 910e08f
@hoopoepg hoopoepg changed the title MCA/ATOMICS/UCX: workaround for abstraction violation MCA/ATOMICS/UCX: workaround for abstraction violation - v2.x Jul 12, 2018
@jsquyres jsquyres changed the title MCA/ATOMICS/UCX: workaround for abstraction violation - v2.x v2.x: MCA/ATOMICS/UCX: workaround for abstraction violation - v2.x Jul 12, 2018
@jsquyres
Copy link
Member

@hoopoepg Don't forget to assign reviewers, labels, and a milestone. RM's are (highly) likely to miss PRs if labels / milestones aren't assigned.

@hoopoepg hoopoepg added this to the v2.1.4 milestone Jul 13, 2018
@hoopoepg hoopoepg requested a review from yosefe July 13, 2018 05:58
@hppritcha hppritcha merged commit e6eed4b into open-mpi:v2.x Jul 16, 2018
@hppritcha hppritcha modified the milestones: v2.1.4, v2.0.5 Jul 16, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants