NO-JIRA: fix(pydantic_schemas): new podman version changed output of podman info

[jiridanek]

Schema needs to be updated to also handle a list[str] value that may now be present.

Description

❯ podman version
Client:        Podman Engine
Version:       5.4.2
API Version:   5.4.2
Go Version:    go1.24.2
Built:         Wed Apr  2 15:43:09 2025
Build Origin:  brew
OS/Arch:       darwin/arm64

Server:       Podman Engine
Version:      5.4.1
API Version:  5.4.1
Go Version:   go1.23.7
Git Commit:   b79bc8afe796cba51dd906270a7e1056ccdfcf9e
Built:        Tue Mar 11 01:00:00 2025
OS/Arch:      linux/arm64

How Has This Been Tested?

Pytest tests work on my machine now whereas before they would fail with pydantic validation error.

INTERNALERROR>     info = tests.containers.pydantic_schemas.PodmanInfo.model_validate(podman_client.info())
INTERNALERROR>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
INTERNALERROR>   File "/Users/jdanek/IdeaProjects/notebooks/.venv/lib/python3.12/site-packages/pydantic/main.py", line 627, in model_validate
INTERNALERROR>     return cls.__pydantic_validator__.validate_python(
INTERNALERROR>            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
INTERNALERROR> pydantic_core._pydantic_core.ValidationError: 1 validation error for PodmanInfo
INTERNALERROR> store.graphOptions.`overlay.additionalImageStores`
INTERNALERROR>   Input should be a valid string [type=string_type, input_value=['/usr/lib/containers/storage'], input_type=list]
INTERNALERROR>     For further information visit https://errors.pydantic.dev/2.10/v/string_type

Process finished with exit code 3

Merge criteria:

• The commits are squashed in a cohesive manner and have meaningful messages.
• Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[jstourac]

Thanks for this Jiri; is this backward compatible or shall we be sure all team-members are on some decent version of podman?

[jiridanek]

It strictly expands the set of jsons that will be parsed without error, so yes, backwards compatible.

[jiridanek]

Here's docs for the class Config thing.

• https://docs.pydantic.dev/1.10/usage/model_config/
• https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/api/config/#pydantic.config.ConfigDict.extra

[jiridanek]

Yeah, class Config is so Pydantic v1, I'll update to the v2 syntax.

[jstourac]

/lgtm

[jiridanek]

/approve

/override ci/prow/images
not applicable

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jiridanek

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [jiridanek]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci]

@jiridanek: Overrode contexts on behalf of jiridanek: ci/prow/images

In response to this:

/approve

/override ci/prow/images
not applicable

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.