Skip to content

OSSM-9557 OSSM 3.0.2 (At Stage): [DOC] Release Notes #93671

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: service-mesh-docs-main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor

@shreyasiddhartha shreyasiddhartha commented May 22, 2025

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 22, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

🤖 Thu May 22 06:23:44 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:
https://93671--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app
Complete list of updated preview URLs: artifacts/updated_preview_urls.txt

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2025

@shreyasiddhartha: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label service-mesh

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs label May 22, 2025
Copy link

@pbajjuri20 pbajjuri20 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM..!

@shreyasiddhartha
Copy link
Contributor Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 22, 2025
@lahinson lahinson added peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@lahinson lahinson left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM for peer review

@lahinson lahinson added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR labels May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR service-mesh Label for all Service Mesh PRs size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants