Skip to content

Update log6x-oc-explain.adoc #93678

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: enterprise-4.14
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

amandverma
Copy link

@amandverma amandverma commented May 22, 2025

Changed type information for lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size from integer to string

lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size should be defined using an string value

Version(s):

4.14

Issue:

https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OBSDOCS-1887

Link to docs preview:

https://93678--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/observability/logging/logging-6.0/log6x-upgrading-to-6.html

QE review:

  • QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 22, 2025
@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented May 22, 2025

@amandverma
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 22, 2025
@jab-rh
Copy link
Contributor

jab-rh commented May 22, 2025

@amandverma, same comment as in: #93675 (review)

@jab-rh jab-rh added peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR and removed peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 22, 2025
Changed type information for lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size from integer to string

Update log6x-oc-explain.adoc

improving grammar
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented May 22, 2025

@amandverma: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@amandverma
Copy link
Author

/label peer-review-needed

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR label May 22, 2025
@skopacz1 skopacz1 added the peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR label May 22, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@skopacz1 skopacz1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Left one out of scope comment for you to consider (though I would recommend addressing it in another PR), otherwise LGTM!

The same out-of-scope comment applies to your other PRs, but I won't repeat the feedback in all of them

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ For example:
$ oc explain lokistacks.loki.grafana.com.spec.size
----

This will show that `size` should be defined using an integer value.
This output shows that the `size` field must be set to a string value.

== Default Values
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would recommend doing this in another PR if it's something that you want to change, but in either case this is out of scope and up to you - I notice that none of these second level headings have IDs on them, which they should have.

If this is something you want to fix in another PR, I would go through this file and make sure every heading has an ID, like this:

Suggested change
== Default Values
[id="default-values_{context}"]
== Default Values

@skopacz1 skopacz1 added branch/enterprise-4.14 and removed peer-review-in-progress Signifies that the peer review team is reviewing this PR peer-review-needed Signifies that the peer review team needs to review this PR labels May 22, 2025
@skopacz1 skopacz1 added this to the Continuous Release milestone May 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
branch/enterprise-4.14 peer-review-done Signifies that the peer review team has reviewed this PR size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants