Skip to content

format error returned from failed templateinstance less unpleasantly #16663

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2017

Conversation

jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor

# oc get templateinstances a71f7ab8-e448-4826-8f05-32a185222dd8 -o yaml
...
status:
  conditions:
  - lastTransitionTime: 2017-10-03T18:11:30Z
    message: |-
      secrets "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      services "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      routes "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      imagestreams "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      buildconfigs "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      deploymentconfigs "cakephp-mysql-example" already exists
      services "mysql" already exists
      deploymentconfigs "mysql" already exists
    reason: Failed
    status: "True"
    type: InstantiateFailure

@spadgett @rhamilto

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 3, 2017
@bparees
Copy link
Contributor

bparees commented Oct 3, 2017

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 3, 2017
@bparees bparees added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label Oct 3, 2017
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: bparees, jim-minter

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these OWNERS Files:

You can indicate your approval by writing /approve in a comment
You can cancel your approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 3, 2017
@jim-minter
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Automatic merge from submit-queue (batch tested with PRs 16644, 16649, 16656, 16651, 16663).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants