Skip to content

OCPBUGS-55951: Bump ovn and ovs to latest 23.06 and 3.1 respectively #2554

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-4.12
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sdodson
Copy link
Member

@sdodson sdodson commented May 8, 2025

This moves ovs from 2.17 in the container image to 3.1 matching RHCOS as used since Feb 2024, see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-22701

Regression testing only, no specific functional fixes

This moves ovs from 2.17 in the container image to 3.1 matching
RHCOS as used since Feb 2024, see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-22701
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels May 8, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55951, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target either version "4.12." or "openshift-4.12.", but it targets "4.13.z" instead
  • release note text must be set and not match the template OR release note type must be set to "Release Note Not Required". For more information you can reference the OpenShift Bug Process.
  • expected Jira Issue OCPBUGS-55951 to depend on a bug targeting a version in 4.13.0, 4.13.z and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), CLOSED (CURRENT RELEASE), CLOSED (DONE), CLOSED (DONE-ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /jira refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Jira bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This moves ovs from 2.17 in the container image to 3.1 matching RHCOS as used since Feb 2024, see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OCPBUGS-22701

Regression testing only, no specific functional fixes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from abhat and tssurya May 8, 2025 14:19
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign jacobtanenbaum for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented May 13, 2025

/retest-required

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented May 13, 2025

@igsilya : can you PTAL this? what are the OVS side implications here? What are the new things we are bringing in?
@asood-rh and @anuragthehatter PTAL

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented May 13, 2025

/retest-required

@igsilya
Copy link
Contributor

igsilya commented May 13, 2025

@igsilya : can you PTAL this? what are the OVS side implications here? What are the new things we are bringing in?

@tssurya Mostly the same stuff as in here: #2553 (comment)
Since we're upgrading from 2.17 to 3.1, we're also gaining a few performance improvements in OVSDB. The most important one is the move of the database compaction processing into a separate thread.

No major API changes that we'd care about inside the container.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented May 13, 2025

/test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

@tssurya
Copy link
Contributor

tssurya commented May 14, 2025

/retest-required
holding approval for green CI

@sdodson
Copy link
Member Author

sdodson commented May 15, 2025

/override ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Neither of those have passed since February

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2025

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade ci/prow/4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-local-gateway-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Neither of those have passed since February

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented May 15, 2025

@sdodson: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/security 11d0867 link false /test security
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn 11d0867 link false /test e2e-azure-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift 11d0867 link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-hypershift

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
jira/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants