Minor fixes

[snir911]

No description provided.

[openshift-ci]

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances secret variable checks in various cloud image handler scripts by temporarily disabling shell debug tracing and updates Docker ignore patterns to exclude generated output directories.

• Suppress set -x tracing around sensitive environment variable validations in libvirt, GCP, Azure, and AWS handlers.
• Remove initial unconditional debug tracing lines in GCP, Azure, and AWS handlers.
• Add output/ and bootc/output/ directories to .dockerignore files to prevent generated artifacts from being included in images.

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 7 out of 7 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
config/peerpods/podvm/libvirt-podvm-image-handler.sh	Wrap secret checks in trace suppression blocks
config/peerpods/podvm/gcp-podvm-image-handler.sh	Add trace suppression around GCP_CREDENTIALS check
config/peerpods/podvm/azure-podvm-image-handler.sh	Suppress and restore debug tracing around Azure secret checks
config/peerpods/podvm/aws-podvm-image-handler.sh	Introduce trace suppression for AWS credential checks
config/peerpods/podvm/bootc/.dockerignore	Ignore output/ directory
config/peerpods/podvm/.dockerignore	Ignore bootc/output/ directory
.dockerignore	Add config/peerpods/podvm/bootc/output/ to root ignore file

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

config/peerpods/podvm/gcp-podvm-image-handler.sh:32

• [nitpick] Rather than a standalone check, add GCP_CREDENTIALS back into the required_vars array to centralize validation and simplify the loop.

-    "GCP_CREDENTIALS"

[snir911]

I changed the pr to disable completely the DEBUG option, as suppressing the tracing only when needed can be very easily missed

[bpradipt]

lgtm

[openshift-ci]

@snir911: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[littlejawa]

/lgtm
Thanks @snir911

[snir911]

@littlejawa konflux failures are unrelated?

[littlejawa]

I don't think so.
My understanding is that some additional checks were triggered that reveal issues that did not show up before.
So I don't think it's related to your PR, we will need to address them separately.
/cc @spotlesstofu for confirmation

[openshift-ci]

@littlejawa: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: for, confirmation.

Note that only openshift members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

I don't think so.
My understanding is that some additional checks were triggered that reveal issues that did not show up before.
So I don't think it's related to your PR, we will need to address them separately.
/cc @spotlesstofu for confirmation

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.