Skip to content

Remove unused fields from zvol_task_t #12361

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 19, 2021

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Jul 13, 2021

Motivation and Context

We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Description

Remove the unused fields.

How Has This Been Tested?

It builds.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@ghost ghost added the Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing label Jul 13, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
@ghost ghost force-pushed the zvol_task_t-source branch from 19083f0 to a6d127b Compare July 15, 2021 17:43
@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Jul 15, 2021

  • Rebased

@behlendorf behlendorf added Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) and removed Status: Code Review Needed Ready for review and testing labels Jul 15, 2021
@tonynguien tonynguien merged commit de12cd2 into openzfs:master Jul 19, 2021
@ghost ghost deleted the zvol_task_t-source branch July 19, 2021 17:28
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 23, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#12361
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#12361
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#12361
behlendorf pushed a commit to behlendorf/zfs that referenced this pull request Aug 24, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#12361
behlendorf pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 31, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes #12361
tonyhutter pushed a commit to tonyhutter/zfs that referenced this pull request Sep 15, 2021
We don't use or need the pool name or value source in the zvol tasks.

Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Ryan Moeller <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#12361
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants