ZIL: Replay blocks without next block pointer. #15132
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
If we get next block allocation error during log write, we trigger transaction commit. But the block we have just completed is still written and transactions it covers will be acknowledged normally. If after that we ignore the block during replay just because it is the last in the chain, we may not replay some transactions that we have acknowledged as synced, that is not right. Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc.
behlendorf
approved these changes
Aug 8, 2023
behlendorf
added
Status: Accepted
amotin
added a commit
to amotin/zfs
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
If we get next block allocation error during log write, we trigger transaction commit. But the block we have just completed is still written and transactions it covers will be acknowledged normally. If after that we ignore the block during replay just because it is the last in the chain, we may not replay some transactions that we have acknowledged as synced, that is not right. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15132
behlendorf
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 25, 2023
If we get next block allocation error during log write, we trigger transaction commit. But the block we have just completed is still written and transactions it covers will be acknowledged normally. If after that we ignore the block during replay just because it is the last in the chain, we may not replay some transactions that we have acknowledged as synced, that is not right. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes #15132
lundman
pushed a commit
to openzfsonwindows/openzfs
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 12, 2023
If we get next block allocation error during log write, we trigger transaction commit. But the block we have just completed is still written and transactions it covers will be acknowledged normally. If after that we ignore the block during replay just because it is the last in the chain, we may not replay some transactions that we have acknowledged as synced, that is not right. Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]> Signed-off-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]> Sponsored by: iXsystems, Inc. Closes openzfs#15132
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
If we get next block allocation error during log write, we trigger transaction commit. But the block we have just completed is still written and transactions it covers will be acknowledged normally. If after that we ignore the block during replay just because it is the last in the chain, we may not replay some transactions that we have acknowledged as synced, that is not right.
Types of changes
Checklist:
Signed-off-by.