Skip to content

Use uint64_t instead of u_int64_t #15610

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 30, 2023
Merged

Use uint64_t instead of u_int64_t #15610

merged 1 commit into from Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Nov 30, 2023

Motivation and Context

Taking a (very cautious) look at building openzfs on illumos, build (among a LOT of other things) was unhappy about u_int64_t.

Description

Just use uint64_t as everywhere else.

How Has This Been Tested?

Build.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Performance enhancement (non-breaking change which improves efficiency)
  • Code cleanup (non-breaking change which makes code smaller or more readable)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Library ABI change (libzfs, libzfs_core, libnvpair, libuutil and libzfsbootenv)
  • Documentation (a change to man pages or other documentation)

Checklist:

@behlendorf behlendorf added the Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested) label Nov 30, 2023
@behlendorf behlendorf merged commit 735ba3a into openzfs:master Nov 30, 2023
@ghost ghost deleted the uint branch December 1, 2023 04:38
lundman pushed a commit to openzfsonwindows/openzfs that referenced this pull request Dec 12, 2023
@lundman
Use uint64_t instead of u_int64_t
9facc41 
Reviewed-by: Alexander Motin <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Brian Behlendorf <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yuri Pankov <[email protected]>
Closes openzfs#15610
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Status: Accepted Ready to integrate (reviewed, tested)
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
2 participants
@behlendorf @amotin