Skip to content

fix: renaming mapper primary <-> secondary #1021

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 11, 2022

Conversation

csviri
Copy link
Collaborator

@csviri csviri commented Mar 10, 2022

@metacosm what do you think about this renaming. Not sure how much actual backwards compatibiilty issues it will make since usually implemented as lambda function. But we can document these minor changes.
The current names are very obscure for me, have to think about every time I check.

Also would add glossary page to the web page docs, to cleary define:

  • Secondary Resource (what is a resource actually controller creates)
  • Dependent Resource (is the dependent resource feature)

If you agree.
Later we can extend glossary with additional notions.

@csviri csviri self-assigned this Mar 10, 2022
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 53 Code Smells

36.6% 36.6% Coverage
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

Copy link
Collaborator

@metacosm metacosm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That's fine with me. The old names were indeed confusing. That said, the new names are not that much better but I don't have any better proposal. 😬

@csviri csviri merged commit b358329 into next Mar 11, 2022
@csviri csviri deleted the association-mapper-api-renames branch March 11, 2022 08:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants