A fast, spec-compliant semantic versioning library for Swift.
This library provides a lightweight and efficient implementation of Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 in Swift.
It offers a structured SemanticVersion
type for representing versions with:
major
: Major version component (e.g.,1
in1.2.3
).minor
: Minor version component (e.g.,2
in1.2.3
).patch
: Patch version component (e.g.,3
in1.2.3
).prerelease
: Optional prerelease identifiers (e.g.,["alpha", "1"]
in1.2.3-alpha.1
).build
: Optional build metadata (e.g.,"build.5"
in1.2.3+build.5
).
Parsing, comparison, and validation are fully compliant with the Semantic Versioning 2.0.0 specification.
You can parse a version string at runtime using the failable initializer:
let version = SemanticVersion(versionString) // -> Optional<SemanticVersion>
If the string is not a valid semantic version, the initializer will return nil
.
This library also provides a macro for compile-time safe parsing of semantic versions:
let version = #SemanticVersion("1.2.3-alpha.1+build.5") // -> SemanticVersion
If the provided string is invalid, a compile-time error will be produced.
This ensures that all semantic versions used in your code are guaranteed to be valid at build time.
To use the macro:
- Add
SemanticVersionMacro
as a dependency in yourPackage.swift
:
.target(
name: "YourTarget",
dependencies: [
.product(name: "SemanticVersionMacro", package: "swift-semantic-version")
]
)
- Import
SemanticVersionMacro
in the file where you use the macro:
import SemanticVersionMacro
This library uses Swift 6.1’s package traits feature to offer two selectable parsing backends:
FoundationBackend
(default): Uses Foundation'sNSRegularExpression
for parsing.StringProcessingBackend
: Ues Swift's nativeRegex
literals for parsing.
To configure which parsing backend is used, specify traits in your Package.swift
dependency declaration:
.package(
url: "https://github.com/ph1ps/swift-semantic-version",
from: <current version>,
traits: [
"StringProcessingBackend"
]
)
FoundationBackend
generally provides faster parsing performance, while StringProcessingBackend
is slightly slower.
p0 | p25 | p50 | p75 | p90 | p99 | p100 | Samples | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FoundationBackend invalid (μs) | 56 | 57 | 57 | 57 | 58 | 69 | 234 | 9653 |
FoundationBackend valid (μs) | 100 | 104 | 105 | 106 | 110 | 131 | 385 | 6415 |
StringProcessingBackend invalid (μs) | 162 | 164 | 164 | 165 | 166 | 186 | 364 | 4685 |
StringProcessingBackend valid (μs) | 1219 | 1227 | 1231 | 1237 | 1246 | 1401 | 2038 | 774 |
Details
The benchmarks use a set of 30 valid and 40 invalid semantic version strings, based on a variety of real-world examples and edge cases. Each benchmark measures the time taken to parse all provided versions repeatedly under scaled iterations.FoundationBackend
has a big impact on binary size for platforms where Foundation
is statically linked like Musl
or Wasm
. StringProcessingBackend
on the other hand uses a pure Swift Standard Library implementation, which means no impact on binary size.
Musl | Wasm | |
---|---|---|
FoundationBackend (MB) | ? | 58.3 |
StringProcessingBackend (MB) | ? | 9.3 |
Details
The binary size was measured by building an executable target simply that instantiates a SemanticVersion. The bytes of the resulting binary were taken.swift build --swift-sdk wasm32-unknown-wasi
swift build --swift-sdk x86_64-swift-linux-musl
The different traits have different platform availabilities due to their implementation details, which might be important to you, if you want to increase platform coverage.
iOS | iPadOS | macOS | macCatalyst | tvOS | watchOS | visionOS | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FoundationBackend | 8.0 | 8.0 | 10.15 | 13.1 | 9.0 | 2.0 | 1.0 |
StringProcessingBackend | 16.0 | 16.0 | 13.0 | 16.0 | 16.0 | 9.0 | 1.0 |