fix SLURM typo

[jan-janssen]

fixes #608

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Bug Fixes
  • Simplified the task execution output so that only the final submitted task's result is displayed, providing clearer and more focused information for end-users.
• Chores
  • Added a new cell to the beginning of the Jupyter notebook, encapsulating the previous content for better organization.
  • Updated metadata to reflect changes in the kernelspec and language information.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the JSON structure of the Jupyter notebook file 2-hpc-cluster.ipynb by adding a new cell of type "raw" at the beginning, which encapsulates the entire previous content as a string. Additionally, the metadata section is updated to reflect changes in the kernelspec and language_info, specifically updating the display_name to "Python 3 (ipykernel)" and the version to "3.12.5". The original content remains unchanged and nested within the new raw cell.

Changes

File	Change Summary
notebooks/…/2-hpc-cluster.ipynb	Added a new raw cell at the beginning containing previous content as a string; updated metadata for kernelspec and language_info.

Sequence Diagram(s)

Assessment against linked issues

Objective	Addressed	Explanation
Correct the print statement for SlurmClusterExecutor example [#608]	❌	The PR does not address the typo in the print statement.

Poem

I'm a rabbit with a code delight,
Hopping through bugs with all my might.
A raw cell added, neat and fine,
In the notebook's start, it will shine!
Nibble on bytes until dawn's light.

---

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between d0dd167 and 75a1f55.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• notebooks/2-hpc-cluster.ipynb (1 hunks)

🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)

• notebooks/2-hpc-cluster.ipynb

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (13)

• GitHub Check: notebooks
• GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_old
• GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
• GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
• GitHub Check: unittest_win
• GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
• GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)
• GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)

---

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai plan to trigger planning for file edits and PR creation.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.40%. Comparing base (0d8b8f8) to head (75a1f55).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #609   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.40%   96.40%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        1252     1252           
=======================================
  Hits         1207     1207           
  Misses         45       45           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.