[Maintenance] Remove UML environment file

[jan-janssen]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Chores
  • Updated the workflow for generating UML diagrams to install necessary dependencies directly within the pipeline.
  • Removed the environment configuration file previously used for setting up dependencies.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The .ci_support/environment-uml.yml file, which defined a Conda environment for UML diagram generation, was deleted. The GitHub Actions workflow was updated to install required dependencies (pylint and graphviz) directly within the UML job, and the step was renamed to clarify its purpose.

Changes

File(s)	Change Summary
.ci_support/environment-uml.yml	Deleted the Conda environment YAML file for UML-related dependencies.
.github/workflows/pipeline.yml	Updated UML job: renamed step, added explicit conda install commands for dependencies.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant GitHub Actions
    participant Conda
    participant pyreverse

    GitHub Actions->>Conda: Install pylint and graphviz
    GitHub Actions->>pyreverse: Run pyreverse to generate UML diagrams
    pyreverse-->>GitHub Actions: Output PNG diagrams
    GitHub Actions->>GitHub Actions: Compress diagrams and upload artifact

Loading

Possibly related PRs

• Generate UML diagram #588: Removes the .ci_support/environment-uml.yml file and adjusts the UML job setup, closely mirroring the changes in this PR.

Poem

In the warren, files hop away,
No more YAML where UML would stay.
Conda brings tools with a single call,
Diagrams bloom in the workflow hall.
With every hop, the pipeline's neat—
Bunny paws keep the CI fleet! 🐇

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 96.78%. Comparing base (c81d7a2) to head (4b1712d).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #680   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.78%   96.78%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        1307     1307           
=======================================
  Hits         1265     1265           
  Misses         42       42           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1)

419-421: Consider using Mamba for faster installs
Runtime conda installs can be slow—enable use-mamba: true in the setup-miniconda action and switch to mamba install here to speed up dependency resolution.

 with:
   python-version: "3.13"
   miniforge-version: latest
   condarc-file: .condarc
+  use-mamba: true

 run: |
-    conda install -y pylint graphviz
+    mamba install -y pylint graphviz

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c81d7a2 and 4b1712d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• .ci_support/environment-uml.yml (0 hunks)
• .github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1 hunks)

💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)

• .ci_support/environment-uml.yml

⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (12)

• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.12)
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (ubuntu-latest, 3.11)
• GitHub Check: unittest_flux_openmpi
• GitHub Check: unittest_openmpi (macos-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: notebooks
• GitHub Check: unittest_mpich (macos-latest, 3.13)
• GitHub Check: unittest_flux_mpich
• GitHub Check: unittest_win
• GitHub Check: notebooks_integration
• GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-openmpi.yml)
• GitHub Check: benchmark (ubuntu-latest, 3.13, .ci_support/environment-mpich.yml)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

.github/workflows/pipeline.yml (1)

415-415: Step name update improves clarity
Changing the step name from “Test” to “Generate UML diagram” makes its intent explicit.