Skip to content

PEP 774: Mark as Deferred #4439

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 26, 2025

Conversation

hugovk
Copy link
Member

@hugovk hugovk commented May 24, 2025

  • Change is either:
    • To a Draft PEP
    • To an Accepted or Final PEP, with Steering Council approval
    • To fix an editorial issue (markup, typo, link, header, etc)
  • PR title prefixed with PEP number (e.g. PEP 123: Summary of changes)

📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://pep-previews--4439.org.readthedocs.build/

@hugovk hugovk requested a review from savannahostrowski as a code owner May 24, 2025 09:49
@savannahostrowski
Copy link
Member

Thanks Hugo!

@savannahostrowski savannahostrowski merged commit efbbb3c into python:main May 26, 2025
6 checks passed
Type: Standards Track
Created: 27-Jan-2025
Python-Version: 3.14
Post-History: `27-Jan-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/78548/>`__
Resolution: `14-Mar-2025 <https://discuss.python.org/t/78548/34>`__
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resolution seems wrong here? This is a pause, not an end.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I just copied another deferred PEP. I think the thing to do is, when this is unpaused and retargeted, we delete this resolution.

@AA-Turner
Copy link
Member

AA-Turner commented May 26, 2025

Oh I was too late, sorry!

A

@hugovk hugovk deleted the pep774-mark-as-deferred branch May 26, 2025 19:27
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants