Skip to content

[beta] backport of readd capture disjoint fields gate #85893

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jun 9, 2021
Merged

[beta] backport of readd capture disjoint fields gate #85893

Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
3 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
75dc963
Revert portion of PR #83521 that injected issue #85435 (and thus expo…
pnkfelix May 21, 2021
355dc5c
Regression test for issue 85435.
pnkfelix May 21, 2021
f9f5fc8
no thir-unsafeck in beta
pnkfelix Jun 1, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Prev Previous commit
no thir-unsafeck in beta 
remove testing via `-Z thir-unsafeck`, since it is not appropriate for beta branch.
  • Loading branch information
@pnkfelix
pnkfelix authored Jun 1, 2021
commit f9f5fc89267ab9ccc67a35d56d69e370d0852328
2 changes: 0 additions & 2 deletions src/test/ui/unsafe/issue-85435-unsafe-op-in-let-under-unsafe-under-closure.rs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
// check-pass
// revisions: mir thir
// [thir]compile-flags: -Z thir-unsafeck

// This is issue #85435. But the real story is reflected in issue #85561, where
// a bug in the implementation of feature(capture_disjoint_fields) () was
Expand Down