Skip to content

Add loom support #842

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2025
Merged

Add loom support #842

merged 2 commits into from
May 6, 2025

Conversation

ibraheemdev
Copy link
Contributor

@ibraheemdev ibraheemdev commented May 6, 2025

Doesn't add any tests yet, but should still be good to merge to avoid having to rebase. I think the one thing missing here is a polyfill for crossbeam-queue. I also added a workflow to make sure everything compiles under cfg(loom).

cc @davidbarsky

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 6, 2025

Deploy Preview for salsa-rs canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit e4291e7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/salsa-rs/deploys/681a28287f83fa0008d901de

@davidbarsky
Copy link
Contributor

Nice! Thanks for getting it over the line.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented May 6, 2025

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #842 will not alter performance

Comparing ibraheemdev:ibraheem/loom (e4291e7) with master (b2b82bc)

Summary

✅ 12 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Contributor

@MichaReiser MichaReiser left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice, thank you

@MichaReiser MichaReiser added this pull request to the merge queue May 6, 2025
Merged via the queue into salsa-rs:master with commit 5402046 May 6, 2025
16 of 17 checks passed
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 6, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request May 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants