feat: Kafka 4.0 support #1384
Merged
feat: Kafka 4.0 support #1384
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Looking forward to the merger |
Closed
LeonHartley
pushed a commit
to LeonHartley/kafka-go
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2025
* Kafka 4.0 protocol fields updated * dynamic versions support * review fixes * fix scram sasl deployment for kafka 4.0 * fix indentation * fix some tests * add docker_compose_versions * add KAFKA_HEAP_OPTS to stop OOM errors * try running kafka 400 last to see if that avoids OOM errors * try adding G1GC to reduce out of memory errors from kafka * disable kafka 4.0.0 for now * fix typo and add documentation on Kafka 4.0 issues --------- Co-authored-by: maxwolf8852 <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Putting the final touches on great work started here #1379 by maxwolf8852
Note that Kafka 4.0 has issues with memory noted here so we cannot test against it in CI yet #1360 (comment)