Skip to content

[Dependency Scanning] Remove obsolete placeholder module concept #82031

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

artemcm
Copy link
Contributor

@artemcm artemcm commented Jun 5, 2025

This was used a long time ago for a design of a scanner which could rely on the client to specify that some modules will be present at a given location but are not yet during the scan. We have long ago determined that the scanner must have all modules available to it at the time of scan for soundness. This code has been stale for a couple of years and it is time to simplify things a bit by deleting it.

@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Jun 5, 2025

@artemcm artemcm force-pushed the RemovePlaceholdersInDepScanner branch from 17cf28d to 78ad677 Compare June 5, 2025 22:00
@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Jun 5, 2025

This was used a long time ago for a design of a scanner which could rely on the client to specify that some modules *will be* present at a given location but are not yet during the scan. We have long ago determined that the scanner must have all modules available to it at the time of scan for soundness. This code has been stale for a couple of years and it is time to simplify things a bit by deleting it.
@artemcm artemcm force-pushed the RemovePlaceholdersInDepScanner branch from 78ad677 to 0ff8d8e Compare June 5, 2025 22:34
@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Jun 5, 2025

@artemcm
Copy link
Contributor Author

artemcm commented Jun 6, 2025

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant