Skip to content

Burn to claim macro audit fixes #523

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 27 commits into from
Oct 4, 2023
Merged

Conversation

nkrishang
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@socket-security
Copy link

Removed dependencies detected. Learn more about Socket for GitHub ↗︎

🚮 Removed packages: @thirdweb-dev/[email protected]

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 19 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Files Coverage Δ
...racts/extension/upgradeable/AccountPermissions.sol 40.90% <ø> (ø)
...tracts/extension/upgradeable/BatchMintMetadata.sol 77.50% <ø> (ø)
contracts/extension/upgradeable/BurnToClaim.sol 90.47% <100.00%> (+0.47%) ⬆️
...ntracts/extension/upgradeable/ContractMetadata.sol 90.00% <ø> (+20.00%) ⬆️
contracts/extension/upgradeable/DelayedReveal.sol 84.21% <ø> (ø)
contracts/extension/upgradeable/Drop.sol 87.87% <ø> (ø)
contracts/extension/upgradeable/ERC2771Context.sol 0.00% <ø> (ø)
...xtension/upgradeable/ERC2771ContextUpgradeable.sol 53.84% <ø> (+23.07%) ⬆️
contracts/extension/upgradeable/Initializable.sol 11.11% <ø> (ø)
contracts/extension/upgradeable/LazyMint.sol 83.33% <ø> (ø)
... and 24 more

... and 17 files with indirect coverage changes

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!.

@nkrishang nkrishang merged commit 168b4b1 into main Oct 4, 2023
@nkrishang nkrishang deleted the burn-to-claim-macro-audit-fixes branch October 4, 2023 19:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants