Skip to content

handle policy restrictions from bundler service #4

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 29, 2025

Conversation

joaquim-verges
Copy link
Member

@joaquim-verges joaquim-verges commented Jun 29, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved error messages for paymaster policy restrictions, providing clearer details when a policy blocks an operation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling to better distinguish between retryable and non-retryable errors, ensuring that policy-related restrictions are not retried automatically.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 29, 2025

"""

Walkthrough

This change adds explicit handling for paymaster policy restriction errors in the external bundler send logic. It introduces a new error struct and enum variant for policy errors, updates error mapping and retry logic to recognize and process these errors, and adjusts the build step to use the new retryability function.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs Added PaymasterPolicyResponse struct, new PolicyRestriction error variant, error parsing helper, retry logic, and updated error handling in user operation build step.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant UserOpBuilder
    participant Bundler
    participant ErrorHandler

    UserOpBuilder->>Bundler: Send user operation
    Bundler-->>UserOpBuilder: Respond with error (may include paymaster policy error)
    UserOpBuilder->>ErrorHandler: Map error using map_build_error
    ErrorHandler->>ErrorHandler: try_parse_policy_error (if PaymasterError)
    alt PolicyRestriction detected
        ErrorHandler-->>UserOpBuilder: Return PolicyRestriction error
        UserOpBuilder->>ErrorHandler: is_external_bundler_error_retryable
        ErrorHandler-->>UserOpBuilder: Returns false (non-retryable)
        UserOpBuilder-->>UserOpBuilder: Fail job
    else Other error
        ErrorHandler-->>UserOpBuilder: Return other error variant
        UserOpBuilder->>ErrorHandler: is_external_bundler_error_retryable
        ErrorHandler-->>UserOpBuilder: Returns true/false based on error type
        UserOpBuilder-->>UserOpBuilder: Retry or fail job based on result
    end
Loading

"""


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2e54c2c and 6867b2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (6 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs
✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (1)

788-824: Consider adding documentation

The function implementation is correct and comprehensive. The retry logic properly handles all error variants with sensible decisions.

Consider adding a doc comment to explain the retry strategy:

+/// Determines if an ExternalBundlerSendError should be retried.
+/// 
+/// Returns `false` for:
+/// - Policy restrictions (permanent failures)
+/// - User cancellations
+/// - Validation errors (invalid salt, credentials, account determination)
+/// 
+/// Returns `true` for:
+/// - Temporary failures (deployment locks, chain service errors, internal errors)
+/// 
+/// For build and bundler failures, delegates to the existing retry logic based on the inner error.
 fn is_external_bundler_error_retryable(e: &ExternalBundlerSendError) -> bool {
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between eb6877f and 2e54c2c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (6 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (2)
executors/src/external_bundler/deployment.rs (1)
  • serde_json (179-179)
twmq/src/lib.rs (1)
  • serde_json (750-750)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
executors/src/external_bundler/send.rs (5)

20-20: LGTM!

The serde_json import is correctly added and necessary for JSON parsing operations.


78-85: LGTM!

The PaymasterPolicyError struct is well-structured with appropriate derives and serde attributes for JSON deserialization.


131-136: LGTM!

The PolicyRestriction error variant is well-defined with clear error messaging that includes both the reason and policy ID.


421-421: LGTM!

The function call change correctly uses the new is_external_bundler_error_retryable function to handle the expanded error types including policy restrictions.


603-625: LGTM!

The policy error detection logic is well-implemented with proper early return pattern and comprehensive checking of both HTTP body and deserialization error text.

Comment on lines 78 to 86
// --- Policy Error Structure ---
#[derive(Serialize, Deserialize, Debug, Clone)]
#[serde(rename_all = "camelCase")]
pub struct PaymasterPolicyError {
pub policy_id: String,
pub reason: String,
}

// --- Error Types ---
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PaymasterPolicyError at the top level feels off because it's not generic, it's a thirdweb specific abstraction. I'd probably have this be expressed into existing auth error, making auth error more detailed if necessary

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

dont think it really fits in auth. its more like a valid response that in this case is treated as an error.

rename the var to PaymasterPolicyResponse so its clear

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

technically the proper flow would be to make the reqwest return type a union, but this feels good enough for now

@joaquim-verges joaquim-verges merged commit 6a35f02 into main Jun 29, 2025
3 checks passed
@joaquim-verges joaquim-verges deleted the joaquim/policy branch June 29, 2025 23:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants