Skip to content

GemSpec: parse %q string #4077

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Sep 14, 2024

Conversation

masatake
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
@masatake masatake changed the title Gemspec: parse %q string GemSpec: parse %q string Sep 14, 2024
@masatake masatake force-pushed the gemspec--PercentString branch from 7fd4d69 to 19b2079 Compare September 14, 2024 02:20
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.52%. Comparing base (5039ab9) to head (fc979de).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4077      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   85.51%   85.52%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         237      237              
  Lines       57030    57083      +53     
==========================================
+ Hits        48769    48822      +53     
  Misses       8261     8261              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@masatake masatake force-pushed the gemspec--PercentString branch from 19b2079 to d8a72cf Compare September 14, 2024 03:02
The original code accepted only `method args1, args2, ...' style
invocations.

Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
@masatake masatake force-pushed the gemspec--PercentString branch from d8a72cf to fc979de Compare September 14, 2024 07:28
@masatake masatake merged commit 74aa396 into universal-ctags:master Sep 14, 2024
69 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant