Skip to content

🐛 Fix Lambda.dispose() to return void instead of boolean #284

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 9, 2025

Conversation

Milly
Copy link
Contributor

@Milly Milly commented Jun 8, 2025

Previously, Lambda.dispose() returned a boolean value from unregister(), even though its type definition specifies a return type of void. This commit updates the implementation to ensure that dispose() and [Symbol.dispose] both return void as intended.

Summary by CodeRabbit

No user-facing changes in this release.

Previously, `Lambda.dispose()` returned a boolean value from
`unregister()`, even though its type definition specifies a return type
of `void`. This commit updates the implementation to ensure that
`dispose()` and `[Symbol.dispose]` both return `void` as intended.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Walkthrough

The change refactors the internal implementation of the add function in lambda/mod.ts by introducing a local dispose function to centralize disposal logic. Both the dispose method and [Symbol.dispose] property of the returned Lambda object now reference this new function, eliminating duplicated inline logic.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
lambda/mod.ts Refactored the add function to use a local dispose function for disposal logic consolidation.

Poem

In the warren of code, a tidy new way,
Disposal now happens in one spot today.
No more repeats, just one little hop—
A single dispose, and cleanup won’t stop.
Rabbits love order, and so does this file,
Refactored and neat, it hops with a smile! 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5f8e7f4 and df6e775.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • lambda/mod.ts (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (6)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 1.45.0, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 1.x, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
  • GitHub Check: test (ubuntu-latest, 1.45.0, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
  • GitHub Check: test (macos-latest, 1.x, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest, 1.x, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
  • GitHub Check: test (windows-latest, 1.45.0, v9.1.0448, v0.10.0)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
lambda/mod.ts (3)

268-268: LGTM! Correctly fixes the return type mismatch.

The void operator appropriately discards the boolean return value from unregister(), ensuring the function returns void as specified in the Lambda interface. This is the correct TypeScript approach for handling unwanted return values.


279-279: Good refactoring to eliminate code duplication.

Referencing the local dispose function instead of inline logic ensures consistent behavior between the dispose method and [Symbol.dispose] property.


280-280: Consistent disposal implementation.

Using the same dispose function for the symbol-based disposal ensures both disposal mechanisms behave identically and return void as expected.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 8, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.80%. Comparing base (5f8e7f4) to head (df6e775).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #284   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.80%   85.80%           
=======================================
  Files          65       65           
  Lines        3458     3459    +1     
  Branches      301      301           
=======================================
+ Hits         2967     2968    +1     
  Misses        489      489           
  Partials        2        2           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@Milly Milly requested a review from lambdalisue June 8, 2025 10:30
Copy link
Member

@lambdalisue lambdalisue left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@lambdalisue lambdalisue merged commit e52df7d into main Jun 9, 2025
10 checks passed
@lambdalisue lambdalisue deleted the lambda-dispose-no-returns branch June 9, 2025 03:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants